writesonic.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 77 days ago
54
→61
+7Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
8/10
10/10
+2
Q&A Content Format
6/10
10/10
+4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
8/10
10/10
+2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
8/10
+3
Comprehensive FAQ Section
3/10
5/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
5/10
8/10
+3
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
6/10
+4
Table & List Extractability
5/10
8/10
+3
Definition Patterns
7/10
9/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
10/10
7/10
-3
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
4/10
+2
Schema Coverage & Depth
8/10
9/10
+1
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
4/10
-3
Visible Date Signal
0/10
10/10
+10
Topic Coherence
6/10
8/10
+2
Content Depth
5/10
8/10
+3
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
5/10
-1
Creator Transparency
3/10
1/10
-2
Methodology Transparency
3/10
2/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
5/10
-1
Answer-First Placement
3/10
5/10
+2
Evidence Packaging
5/10
9/10
+4
Entity Disambiguation
2/10
4/10
+2
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
3/10
-1
Duplicate Content Blocks
3/10
5/10
+2
Internationalization Signals
7/10
5/10
-2
Page Speed: Server Response
7/10
4/10
-3
Page Speed: Load Blockers
6/10
7/10
+1
Page Speed: Page Size
7/10
5/10
-2
Owned Data Density
6/10
0/10
-6
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
10/10
+4
Add Owned Data SignalsImprove Question-Answer AlignmentImprove Citation-Ready WritingAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsFocus Content on Core TopicsIncrease Content DepthAdd Structured Tables & ListsAdd Content Freshness SignalsStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)