withtidy.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
29
→49
+20Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
7/10
+7
Q&A Content Format
0/10
9/10
+9
Clean, Crawlable HTML
4/10
9/10
+5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
1/10
4/10
+3
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
6/10
+6
Original Data & Expert Analysis
1/10
3/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
3/10
6/10
+3
Content Freshness Signals
0/10
2/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
2/10
+2
Table & List Extractability
0/10
3/10
+3
Definition Patterns
0/10
7/10
+7
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
7/10
+7
Author & Expert Schema
0/10
2/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
7/10
6/10
-1
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
2/10
+2
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
4/10
+4
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
7/10
+2
Content Cannibalization
5/10
10/10
+5
Visible Date Signal
0/10
5/10
+5
Topic Coherence
5/10
9/10
+4
Content Depth
3/10
2/10
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
7/10
6/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
4/10
5/10
+1
Creator Transparency
3/10
5/10
+2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
0/10
7/10
+7
Answer-First Placement
3/10
6/10
+3
Evidence Packaging
0/10
6/10
+6
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
3/10
-1
Image Context for AI
5/10
0/10
-5
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
5/10
10/10
+5
Page Speed: Server Response
5/10
7/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
8/10
9/10
+1
Answer Capsule Pattern
5/10
2/10
-3
Entity Density
3/10
6/10
+3
Sentence Atomicity
3/10
6/10
+3
Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Answer Capsule PatternsIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd Entity DisambiguationAdd Content Freshness SignalsFocus Content on Core TopicsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsIncrease Entity DensityRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready WritingPackage Evidence for AI