webhound.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 77 days ago
27
→58
+31Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
7/10
+7
Q&A Content Format
0/10
7/10
+7
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
1/10
5/10
+4
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2/10
5/10
+3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
0/10
5/10
+5
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
2/10
6/10
+4
Content Freshness Signals
0/10
8/10
+8
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
9/10
+9
Table & List Extractability
0/10
10/10
+10
Definition Patterns
0/10
9/10
+9
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
8/10
+8
Author & Expert Schema
0/10
7/10
+7
Fact & Data Density
2/10
10/10
+8
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
7/10
+7
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
7/10
+7
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
7/10
+2
Content Cannibalization
5/10
10/10
+5
Visible Date Signal
0/10
10/10
+10
Topic Coherence
5/10
7/10
+2
Content Depth
3/10
6/10
+3
Helpful Purpose Alignment
5/10
7/10
+2
First-Hand Experience Signals
5/10
2/10
-3
Creator Transparency
4/10
2/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
0/10
6/10
+6
Answer-First Placement
0/10
8/10
+8
Evidence Packaging
0/10
5/10
+5
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
6/10
+6
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
3/10
-2
Image Context for AI
5/10
1/10
-4
Answer Capsule Pattern
5/10
4/10
-1
Entity Density
3/10
8/10
+5
Sentence Atomicity
3/10
8/10
+5
Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Answer Capsule PatternsAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsPackage Evidence for AIIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsAdd Structured Tables & ListsIncrease Entity DensityRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready Writing