AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

useocular.com — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 131 days ago
48
→
49
+1
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
0/10
3/10
+3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
7/10
5/10
-2
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
6/10
-2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
8/10
7/10
-1
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
4/10
+2
Table & List Extractability
7/10
8/10
+1
Direct Answer Paragraphs
7/10
4/10
-3
Fact & Data Density
8/10
6/10
-2
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
7/10
+7
Content Cannibalization
7/10
10/10
+3
Visible Date Signal
5/10
7/10
+2
Topic Coherence
4/10
5/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
1/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
4/10
-1
Answer-First Placement
3/10
8/10
+5
Evidence Packaging
5/10
2/10
-3
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
2/10
+2
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
7/10
+1
Page Speed: Page Size
6/10
7/10
+1
Answer Capsule Pattern
8/10
4/10
-4
Owned Data Density
0/10
6/10
+6
Add Direct Answer ParagraphsIncrease Fact & Data DensityPackage Evidence for AIImprove Citation-Ready WritingImprove Question-Answer AlignmentAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Content Freshness SignalsAdd Answer-First Placement