unfaze.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
44
→25
-19Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
0/10
1/10
+1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5/10
2/10
-3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
1/10
-4
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
2/10
-3
Comprehensive FAQ Section
2/10
0/10
-2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5/10
0/10
-5
Internal Linking Structure
1/10
0/10
-1
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
3/10
0/10
-3
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
0/10
-2
Sitemap Completeness
5/10
0/10
-5
Table & List Extractability
5/10
0/10
-5
Definition Patterns
5/10
0/10
-5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
0/10
-4
Fact & Data Density
10/10
0/10
-10
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
0/10
-10
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
0/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Content Depth
8/10
3/10
-5
Helpful Purpose Alignment
8/10
5/10
-3
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
3/10
4/10
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
0/10
-5
Answer-First Placement
5/10
3/10
-2
Evidence Packaging
4/10
0/10
-4
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
5/10
+2
Image Context for AI
0/10
5/10
+5
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
5/10
-5
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
5/10
-1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
7/10
10/10
+3
Page Speed: Page Size
3/10
10/10
+7
Answer Capsule Pattern
0/10
5/10
+5
Entity Density
8/10
3/10
-5
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
3/10
-3
Increase Fact & Data DensityIncrease Content DepthIncrease Entity DensityImprove Citation-Ready WritingStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Add Answer Capsule PatternsImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Entity DisambiguationBuild Comprehensive FAQ Section