AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

tiptap.dev — v2 vs v3

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v2Last audited 142 days ago
55
→
60
+5
Criterion
v2
v3
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
7/10
9/10
+2
Q&A Content Format
7/10
8/10
+1
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
1/10
+1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4/10
5/10
+1
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
5/10
+3
Table & List Extractability
6/10
8/10
+2
Definition Patterns
7/10
9/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
5/10
8/10
+3
Fact & Data Density
4/10
10/10
+6
Schema Coverage & Depth
5/10
10/10
+5
Visible Date Signal
5/10
9/10
+4
Topic Coherence
9/10
7/10
-2
Content Depth
4/10
6/10
+2
First-Hand Experience Signals
2/10
3/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Answer-First Placement
3/10
5/10
+2
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
5/10
+1
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
7/10
-3
Page Speed: Load Blockers
7/10
6/10
-1
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
6/10
-2
Focus Content on Core TopicsAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsEnhance Author & Expert SchemaIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsAdd Content Freshness SignalsAdd Structured Tables & Lists