AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

thehog.ai — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 138 days ago
42
→
43
+1
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
4/10
3/10
-1
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
4/10
+1
Internal Linking Structure
0/10
6/10
+6
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
5/10
+3
Table & List Extractability
2/10
0/10
-2
Definition Patterns
5/10
0/10
-5
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
7/10
+7
Visible Date Signal
0/10
7/10
+7
Content Depth
5/10
3/10
-2
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
8/10
+2
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
2/10
-1
Creator Transparency
3/10
2/10
-1
Answer-First Placement
4/10
3/10
-1
Evidence Packaging
3/10
1/10
-2
Entity Disambiguation
1/10
0/10
-1
Image Context for AI
1/10
0/10
-1
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
5/10
-1
Package Evidence for AIRestructure Content as Q&AAdd Entity DisambiguationImprove Question-Answer AlignmentImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)