sav.money — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
60
→49
-11Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema.org Structured Data
9/10
6/10
-3
Q&A Content Format
5/10
4/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
8/10
5/10
-3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
3/10
-2
Comprehensive FAQ Section
9/10
7/10
-2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
5/10
-1
Internal Linking Structure
10/10
3/10
-7
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
5/10
4/10
-1
Sitemap Completeness
10/10
5/10
-5
RSS/Atom Feed
10/10
0/10
-10
Table & List Extractability
5/10
3/10
-2
Definition Patterns
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
2/10
0/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
9/10
2/10
-7
Fact & Data Density
9/10
8/10
-1
Content Publishing Velocity
7/10
2/10
-5
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
9/10
-1
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
0/10
-7
Visible Date Signal
8/10
3/10
-5
Topic Coherence
9/10
5/10
-4
Content Depth
7/10
9/10
+2
Helpful Purpose Alignment
4/10
7/10
+3
Creator Transparency
9/10
2/10
-7
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
8/10
6/10
-2
Answer-First Placement
5/10
3/10
-2
Entity Disambiguation
2/10
0/10
-2
Image Context for AI
3/10
1/10
-2
Page Speed: Server Response
4/10
6/10
+2
Page Speed: Load Blockers
1/10
7/10
+6
Page Speed: Page Size
3/10
2/10
-1
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
10/10
+2
Focus Content on Core TopicsImprove Question-Answer AlignmentImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureIncrease Content DepthRestructure Content as Q&APackage Evidence for AI