runcascade.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 142 days ago
42
→33
-9Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Clean, Crawlable HTML
6/10
5/10
-1
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
4/10
-2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
1/10
3/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
5/10
0/10
-5
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6/10
4/10
-2
Table & List Extractability
2/10
0/10
-2
Definition Patterns
5/10
0/10
-5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
0/10
-4
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
0/10
-2
Fact & Data Density
8/10
7/10
-1
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Topic Coherence
9/10
5/10
-4
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
5/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
2/10
5/10
+3
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
4/10
+2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
3/10
-3
Entity Disambiguation
4/10
3/10
-1
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
3/10
-2
Image Context for AI
1/10
5/10
+4
Duplicate Content Blocks
5/10
10/10
+5
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
5/10
-5
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
7/10
+1
Page Speed: Page Size
2/10
6/10
+4
Answer Capsule Pattern
2/10
5/10
+3
Entity Density
10/10
0/10
-10
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
10/10
+2
Increase Entity DensityFocus Content on Core TopicsImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureFix Duplicate Content BlocksAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Answer Capsule Patterns