rondah.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 90 days ago
55
→56
+1Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
10/10
0/10
-10
Q&A Content Format
10/10
9/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
8/10
5/10
-3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
6/10
+1
Comprehensive FAQ Section
2/10
1/10
-1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
8/10
10/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
2/10
4/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
3/10
-1
Table & List Extractability
4/10
9/10
+5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
2/10
-2
Visible Date Signal
5/10
0/10
-5
Topic Coherence
8/10
9/10
+1
Content Depth
9/10
8/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
7/10
6/10
-1
Evidence Packaging
5/10
4/10
-1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
8/10
+2
Image Context for AI
1/10
0/10
-1
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
3/10
10/10
+7
Page Speed: Server Response
5/10
6/10
+1
Sentence Atomicity
10/10
8/10
-2
Package Evidence for AIAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsFix Duplicate Content BlocksAdd Structured Tables & ListsEliminate Cross-Page Duplicate ContentStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)