AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

rondah.ai — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 137 days ago
55
→
56
+1
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
10/10
0/10
-10
Q&A Content Format
10/10
9/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
8/10
5/10
-3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
6/10
+1
Comprehensive FAQ Section
2/10
1/10
-1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
8/10
10/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
2/10
4/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
3/10
-1
Table & List Extractability
4/10
9/10
+5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
2/10
-2
Visible Date Signal
5/10
0/10
-5
Topic Coherence
8/10
9/10
+1
Content Depth
9/10
8/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
7/10
6/10
-1
Evidence Packaging
5/10
4/10
-1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
8/10
+2
Image Context for AI
1/10
0/10
-1
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
3/10
10/10
+7
Page Speed: Server Response
5/10
6/10
+1
Sentence Atomicity
10/10
8/10
-2
Package Evidence for AIAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsFix Duplicate Content BlocksAdd Structured Tables & ListsEliminate Cross-Page Duplicate ContentStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)