riverkin.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
43
→46
+3Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
4/10
3/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
7/10
8/10
+1
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
5/10
+2
Comprehensive FAQ Section
2/10
0/10
-2
Internal Linking Structure
7/10
1/10
-6
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
8/10
6/10
-2
Sitemap Completeness
8/10
5/10
-3
Table & List Extractability
3/10
2/10
-1
Definition Patterns
2/10
7/10
+5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
3/10
-1
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
2/10
0/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
4/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
10/10
8/10
-2
Content Publishing Velocity
3/10
2/10
-1
Content Cannibalization
3/10
10/10
+7
Topic Coherence
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Depth
1/10
5/10
+4
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
6/10
+1
Answer-First Placement
7/10
4/10
-3
Evidence Packaging
0/10
1/10
+1
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
5/10
+5
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
4/10
+1
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
5/10
10/10
+5
Page Speed: Load Blockers
5/10
7/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
4/10
3/10
-1
Entity Density
8/10
10/10
+2
Owned Data Density
0/10
5/10
+5
Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionRestructure Content as Q&AAdd Owned Data SignalsStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Add Entity Disambiguation