AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

riohealth.com — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 139 days ago
50
→
56
+6
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
4/10
6/10
+2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
3/10
-2
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
1/10
+1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
5/10
+3
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
9/10
+9
Direct Answer Paragraphs
2/10
8/10
+6
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
2/10
-2
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema Coverage & Depth
5/10
6/10
+1
Content Cannibalization
5/10
9/10
+4
Visible Date Signal
5/10
3/10
-2
Helpful Purpose Alignment
5/10
7/10
+2
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
2/10
-1
Creator Transparency
2/10
1/10
-1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4/10
7/10
+3
Evidence Packaging
4/10
5/10
+1
Extraction Friction Score
1/10
2/10
+1
Duplicate Content Blocks
5/10
9/10
+4
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
9/10
7/10
-2
Answer Capsule Pattern
2/10
4/10
+2
Strengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Add First-Hand Experience SignalsPackage Evidence for AIReduce Extraction FrictionAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsFix Duplicate Content BlocksAdd Content Freshness SignalsImprove Citation-Ready Writing