responsive.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
44
→27
-17Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
2/10
0/10
-2
Clean, Crawlable HTML
6/10
2/10
-4
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
1/10
-4
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
3/10
+3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5/10
0/10
-5
Internal Linking Structure
7/10
0/10
-7
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
2/10
-2
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
0/10
-2
Table & List Extractability
3/10
0/10
-3
Definition Patterns
5/10
0/10
-5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
8/10
0/10
-8
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
0/10
-2
Fact & Data Density
6/10
1/10
-5
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
5/10
+5
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
0/10
-10
Topic Coherence
5/10
10/10
+5
Content Depth
3/10
0/10
-3
Helpful Purpose Alignment
5/10
4/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
2/10
3/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
4/10
+2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
0/10
-6
Answer-First Placement
6/10
0/10
-6
Entity Disambiguation
3/10
0/10
-3
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
2/10
-1
Image Context for AI
1/10
5/10
+4
Page Speed: Server Response
8/10
7/10
-1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
8/10
9/10
+1
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
5/10
+1
Entity Density
10/10
3/10
-7
Owned Data Density
4/10
0/10
-4
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
3/10
-3
Add Direct Answer ParagraphsIncrease Entity DensityImprove Citation-Ready WritingStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureFocus Content on Core TopicsPackage Evidence for AIBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionAdd Content Freshness SignalsAdd Answer Capsule Patterns