rapchat.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 64 days ago
45
→60
+15Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
10/10
0/10
-10
Q&A Content Format
2/10
10/10
+8
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5/10
9/10
+4
Comprehensive FAQ Section
5/10
6/10
+1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
3/10
5/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
4/10
8/10
+4
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
9/10
+5
Sitemap Completeness
8/10
9/10
+1
Table & List Extractability
0/10
9/10
+9
Definition Patterns
3/10
7/10
+4
Direct Answer Paragraphs
2/10
10/10
+8
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
2/10
4/10
+2
Author & Expert Schema
7/10
4/10
-3
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
10/10
+8
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
8/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
7/10
-3
Content Depth
7/10
4/10
-3
Helpful Purpose Alignment
4/10
6/10
+2
Creator Transparency
3/10
1/10
-2
Methodology Transparency
5/10
3/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
7/10
+2
Answer-First Placement
0/10
5/10
+5
Evidence Packaging
0/10
7/10
+7
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
4/10
+4
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
5/10
+1
Image Context for AI
5/10
1/10
-4
Duplicate Content Blocks
10/10
7/10
-3
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
7/10
-3
Page Speed: Server Response
4/10
6/10
+2
Page Speed: Load Blockers
10/10
8/10
-2
Page Speed: Page Size
8/10
7/10
-1
Answer Capsule Pattern
5/10
6/10
+1
Entity Density
0/10
10/10
+10
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
10/10
+4
Increase Content DepthIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsFix Duplicate Content BlocksStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Increase Entity DensityAdd Structured Tables & ListsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsPackage Evidence for AIRestructure Content as Q&A