Skip to main content

Platform

AEO Website Research-grade Content Content Factory About Audits Rankings Pricing

Resources

Knowledge Base Research FAQ
Audit
OverviewHow to ImproveScore BreakdownSite PagesGuides
projecthealingwaters.org

projecthealingwaters.org

Weak AI visibility with 18 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.

Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyHealth & Wellness
42/100
2 since v1
F
Citation Avg
Coherence gate active - score capped at 55
Answer Readiness
~40% weight
5/10
Content Structure
~25% weight
4/10
Trust & Authority
~15% weight
3/10
Technical Foundation
~10% weight
3/10
AI Discovery
~10% weight
6/10

Verdict

Critical AEO gaps at 42/100 - projecthealingwaters.org is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include Sitemap Completeness, Canonical URL Strategy, and Content Publishing Velocity. Priority gaps: llms.txt File, Schema.org Structured Data, and Q&A Content Format. Topic coherence is 4/10, which caps the overall score at 55. Focusing content on core expertise areas is the single highest-impact improvement.

How to Improve

Current
42/100
Projected
76/100
39Total Fixes
9Quick Wins
~87hEst. Effort
Quick Wins
Create /llms.txt fileConfigure robots.txt for AI crawlersAdd direct answer paragraphsAdd ai.txt and content licensingEnhance author and expert schemaAdd visible date signalsFocus blog content on core expertiseImprove citation-ready writing qualityImprove server response efficiency
Create /llms.txt file
critical|low
Add llms-full.txt with extended content
medium|low
Reduce render-blocking resources
critical|medium
Reduce document weight
critical|medium
Fix HTML structure and meta tags
medium|low
Configure robots.txt for AI crawlers
high|trivial
Add internationalization signals
critical|medium
Improve server response efficiency
high|low

Top Opportunities10

Ensure blog content consistently covers your core expertise areas rather than scattering across unrelated topics. AI engines build authority models - a site about "Medicare coverage" that also publishes about humidifiers and groceries dilutes its topical authority.

Expand articles to 1000+ words with structured H2/H3 sections, comparison tables, and expert analysis. Thin content (under 300 words) is rarely cited by AI engines. Deep, well-structured articles demonstrate expertise.

Add question-based headings (H2/H3) throughout your content. Use "What is...", "How does...", "Why should..." patterns that match how users query AI assistants.

Ensure every question-format heading (H2/H3) is followed by a direct answer paragraph. This pattern is ideal for AI engine snippet extraction.

Publish original research, statistics, case studies, or proprietary data that AI engines can cite. Unique data points make your content a primary source rather than a derivative one.

Use HTML tables for comparison data and ordered/unordered lists for features, steps, and specifications. Structured data formats are directly extractable by AI engines for answers.

Write 20-25 word self-contained answer sentences immediately after each H2 heading. 72.4% of AI-cited posts use this pattern - it gives engines a ready-made snippet to quote.

Write concise, standalone answer paragraphs (2-3 sentences) immediately after question headings. These "snippet-ready" paragraphs are ideal for AI engine citations.

Include "our analysis", "our data", "our testing" phrases backed by original research or proprietary data. 52.2% of AI-cited posts contain owned data signals.

Include dateModified schema, visible last-updated dates, and time elements on content pages. Fresh content signals help AI engines prioritize your pages over stale alternatives.

Fix It With AI42

Your competitors are already optimizing for AI

Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.

Fix My Score

Site Pages

projecthealingwaters.org/about-us/faqsF39
FAQs : Project Healing Waters
projecthealingwaters.org/get-involvedF25
Get Involved : Project Healing Waters
projecthealingwaters.org/about-us/our-chaptersF28
Our Chapters : Project Healing Waters
projecthealingwaters.org/board-staff/sarah-thomasF26
Sarah Thomas : Project Healing Waters
Changes since v1Last audited 70 days ago
44
42
-2
View full comparison →
Focus Content on Core TopicsIncrease Content DepthRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Question-Answer AlignmentAdd Original Data & Case StudiesAdd Structured Tables & ListsAdd Answer Capsule PatternsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Content Freshness Signals

Improve Your Score

Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement

Related Questions

Browse all FAQs →

Want us to improve your score?

We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.

Let's Talk