pearsonlabs.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 78 days ago
45
→28
-17Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
9/10
0/10
-9
Clean, Crawlable HTML
9/10
4/10
-5
Original Data & Expert Analysis
3/10
1/10
-2
Internal Linking Structure
1/10
0/10
-1
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
0/10
-4
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
0/10
-2
Table & List Extractability
3/10
0/10
-3
Direct Answer Paragraphs
8/10
0/10
-8
Author & Expert Schema
5/10
0/10
-5
Query-Answer Alignment
10/10
5/10
-5
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Content Depth
2/10
3/10
+1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
5/10
7/10
+2
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
4/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
4/10
+2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
0/10
-5
Answer-First Placement
8/10
3/10
-5
Entity Disambiguation
2/10
0/10
-2
Image Context for AI
1/10
5/10
+4
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
5/10
-5
Internationalization Signals
3/10
0/10
-3
Page Speed: Load Blockers
9/10
10/10
+1
Answer Capsule Pattern
6/10
5/10
-1
Entity Density
10/10
3/10
-7
Sentence Atomicity
10/10
3/10
-7
Add Direct Answer ParagraphsIncrease Entity DensityRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready WritingPackage Evidence for AIImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionAdd Owned Data Signals