AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

pchcproviders.org — v2 vs v3

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v2Last audited 135 days ago
25
→
38
+13
Criterion
v2
v3
Delta
Q&A Content Format
1/10
0/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
2/10
5/10
+3
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
2/10
+2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
0/10
2/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
0/10
2/10
+2
Content Freshness Signals
0/10
4/10
+4
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
10/10
+10
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
10/10
+10
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
2/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
0/10
7/10
+7
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
2/10
+2
Visible Date Signal
0/10
2/10
+2
Topic Coherence
5/10
9/10
+4
Content Depth
3/10
7/10
+4
First-Hand Experience Signals
4/10
3/10
-1
Creator Transparency
3/10
1/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
0/10
5/10
+5
Answer-First Placement
3/10
0/10
-3
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
5/10
10/10
+5
Internationalization Signals
0/10
3/10
+3
Page Speed: Server Response
7/10
4/10
-3
Page Speed: Load Blockers
10/10
5/10
-5
Page Speed: Page Size
10/10
8/10
-2
Entity Density
3/10
0/10
-3
Sentence Atomicity
3/10
2/10
-1
Package Evidence for AIAdd Answer-First PlacementAdd Owned Data SignalsImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureIncrease Fact & Data DensityIncrease Content DepthFocus Content on Core TopicsImprove Citation-Ready Writing