paysponge.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 77 days ago
43
→56
+13Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
10/10
+10
Q&A Content Format
1/10
10/10
+9
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
6/10
+3
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
4/10
6/10
+2
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
5/10
+5
Original Data & Expert Analysis
1/10
3/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
7/10
+7
Table & List Extractability
3/10
10/10
+7
Definition Patterns
5/10
9/10
+4
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
4/10
+4
Fact & Data Density
4/10
8/10
+4
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
3/10
+3
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
6/10
+6
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
10/10
+5
Topic Coherence
8/10
7/10
-1
Content Depth
1/10
8/10
+7
Methodology Transparency
4/10
3/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
8/10
+3
Answer-First Placement
10/10
3/10
-7
Entity Disambiguation
3/10
4/10
+1
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
4/10
-1
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
5/10
-5
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
7/10
+1
Answer Capsule Pattern
6/10
2/10
-4
Entity Density
8/10
6/10
-2
Owned Data Density
0/10
4/10
+4
Sentence Atomicity
10/10
6/10
-4
Focus Content on Core TopicsAdd Answer Capsule PatternsIncrease Entity DensityAdd Answer-First PlacementPackage Evidence for AIEliminate Cross-Page Duplicate ContentImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureIncrease Content DepthIncrease Fact & Data DensityRestructure Content as Q&AAdd Structured Tables & ListsBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionAdd Owned Data SignalsStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)