Weak AI visibility with 17 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Verdict
Critical AEO gaps at 30/100 - pandabus.cn is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Duplicate Content Blocks, and Cross-Page Duplicate Content. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, Comprehensive FAQ Section, and Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI44
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
A page built with <div> everywhere looks the same to AI as a page with no structure at all. Semantic elements -<main>, <article>, <section>, <time> -are the markup that tells AI where your content starts, what it means, and how it's organized.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.