o11.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 75 days ago
59
→54
-5Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema.org Structured Data
9/10
10/10
+1
Q&A Content Format
7/10
5/10
-2
Clean, Crawlable HTML
9/10
7/10
-2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
8/10
+2
Comprehensive FAQ Section
1/10
3/10
+2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
7/10
6/10
-1
Internal Linking Structure
6/10
7/10
+1
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
9/10
10/10
+1
Content Freshness Signals
7/10
10/10
+3
Definition Patterns
7/10
9/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
7/10
5/10
-2
Fact & Data Density
6/10
8/10
+2
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
7/10
+7
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Visible Date Signal
9/10
10/10
+1
Topic Coherence
9/10
5/10
-4
Content Depth
8/10
4/10
-4
Helpful Purpose Alignment
8/10
6/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
4/10
-2
Answer-First Placement
5/10
7/10
+2
Evidence Packaging
3/10
2/10
-1
Duplicate Content Blocks
10/10
9/10
-1
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
4/10
-2
Page Speed: Load Blockers
8/10
10/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
7/10
6/10
-1
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
6/10
-2
Focus Content on Core TopicsIncrease Content DepthAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsImprove Citation-Ready WritingRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Question-Answer AlignmentIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Add Answer-First Placement