Weak AI visibility with 23 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Verdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 48/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Internal Linking Structure, and Canonical URL Strategy. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, Content Freshness Signals, and RSS/Atom Feed.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI41
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.