What is AEO (AI Engine Optimization)?

AEO is the practice of structuring your website so AI answer engines - ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude - can find, understand, and cite it. SEO gets you ranked in search results. AEO gets you into AI-generated answers. Different game, different rules.

What does the free AEO audit include?

The free audit analyzes your website across 48 criteria that determine AI visibility, including llms.txt, Schema.org structured data, Q&A content format, clean crawlable HTML, entity authority, robots.txt AI policy, FAQ sections, original data, content freshness, fact density, canonical URLs, and more. You get a score out of 100 with specific findings and actionable recommendations.

What are the 48 AEO criteria?

The 48 criteria are organized into 5 pillars with fixed target shares: Answer Readiness 40%, Content Structure 25%, Trust & Authority 15%, Technical Foundation 10%, and AI Discovery 10%. Inside those pillars, criteria cover topic coherence, original data, depth, fact density, direct answers, Q&A structure, entity authority, freshness, visible dates, schema, semantic HTML, extraction friction, llms.txt, robots.txt, licensing, canonicals, sitemap coverage, and RSS. Each criterion is scored 0–10, converted into an effective weight after confidence and overlap controls, then rolled into the final score.

What happens if my site scores below 20?

A score below 20 means most fundamental AEO infrastructure is missing - no llms.txt, no relevant schema, likely blocking AI crawlers, no FAQ content. The good news is the fastest gains come from this starting point. Adding llms.txt, basic Organization schema, and unblocking AI crawlers in robots.txt can double your score in a single day.

What is llms.txt and do I need one?

llms.txt is a plain-text file at your domain root — like robots.txt — that gives AI assistants a structured summary of your website. What your business does, key content areas, how to navigate your site. It helps AI systems understand your business without crawling every page. If you want AI visibility, you need one.

nanonets.com - AEO Audit Report | 62/100

WINTER 2017 nanonets.com

Moderate AI visibility with 31 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.

Scoring Methodology

How Your AEO Site Rank Is Calculated

A weighted average of 48 deterministic criteria. Each scored 0-10, each with a specific weight. No AI judgment calls - every point is traceable.

Moderate visibilityOut of 100 possible points

The Formula

Score = sum(criterion_score / 10 * weight * 100) / sum(weights)

Each criterion is scored 0-10 by deterministic checks, multiplied by its weight, and summed to produce a 0-100 overall score.

Your Score Breakdown

Content9 criteria

Q&A Content Format15%10/10+15.0

FAQ Sections10%6/10+6.0

Original Data10%8/10+8.0

Content Freshness7%2/10+1.4

Direct Answer Paragraphs7%10/10+7.0

Fact & Data Density5%10/10+5.0

Definition Patterns4%5/10+2.0

Query-Answer Alignment8%7/10+5.6

Content Cannibalization5%5/10+2.5

Subtotal71%+52.5

Structure5 criteria

Schema.org JSON-LD15%8/10+12.0

Clean, Crawlable HTML10%9/10+9.0

Semantic HTML55%8/10+4.0

Table & List Extractability7%8/10+5.6

Schema Coverage3%9/10+2.7

Subtotal40%+33.3

Discovery5 criteria

llms.txt10%0/10+0.0

robots.txt for AI5%3/10+1.5

Internal Linking10%8/10+8.0

Sitemap Completeness5%7/10+3.5

RSS/Atom Feed3%0/10+0.0

Subtotal33%+13.0

Trust Signals6 criteria

Entity Authority10%8/10+8.0

Content Licensing4%2/10+0.8

Author & Expert Schema4%4/10+1.6

Canonical URL4%10/10+4.0

Content Velocity3%2/10+0.6

Visible Date Signals4%0/10+0.0

Subtotal29%+15.0

Overall Score100%62/100

Score Ranges

86-100AI-first content architecture

71-85Strong AI visibility

56-70Moderate visibility

41-55Weak visibility

26-40Minimal visibility

0-25Not on the radar

Key Points

Topic Coherence carries the highest weight at 14%, followed by Original Data at 10%, across 48 total criteria.

No HTTPS means Clean HTML is capped at 3/10, costing approximately 3-4 overall points.

Every criterion uses deterministic checks. Same site, same audit, same score - every time.

Read full scoring methodology →

↑2 since v1

Citation Avg

Answer Readiness

~40% weight

7/10

Content Structure

~25% weight

8/10

Trust & Authority

~15% weight

5/10

Technical Foundation

~10% weight

6/10

AI Discovery

~10% weight

4/10

Verdict

Moderate AEO readiness at 62/100 with significant gaps to address. Key strengths include Q&A Content Format, Direct Answer Paragraphs, and Fact & Data Density. Priority gaps: llms.txt File, RSS/Atom Feed, and Speakable Schema.

Top priorities

llms.txt FileDiscovery+10 pts

RSS/Atom FeedDiscovery+10 pts

Speakable SchemaTechnical+10 pts

#531of 13362

View full rankings →

View improvement plan

How to Improve

Current

62/100

Projected

84/100

39Total Fixes

10Quick Wins

~75hEst. Effort

Quick Wins

Create /llms.txt fileConfigure robots.txt for AI crawlersAdd ai.txt and content licensingEnhance author and expert schemaExtend schema to inner pagesAdd visible date signalsMake pages solve the user task fasterAdd first-hand experience signalsReduce extraction frictionReduce render-blocking resources

Fix

Impact

Effort

Create /llms.txt file

Add a machine-readable llms.txt file at your domain root that describes your site, services, and key pages for AI engines.

critical

low

Create /llms.txt file

critical|low

Add llms-full.txt with extended content

Create a comprehensive llms-full.txt with detailed page descriptions, content summaries, and topic taxonomy.

medium

low

Add llms-full.txt with extended content

medium|low

Configure robots.txt for AI crawlers

Update robots.txt to explicitly allow AI crawlers and include sitemap directive.

critical

low

Configure robots.txt for AI crawlers

critical|low

Reduce render-blocking resources

Minimize blocking scripts and stylesheets in <head> to improve content availability for AI crawlers.

high

low

Reduce render-blocking resources

high|low

Fix HTML structure and meta tags

Ensure clean, well-structured HTML with proper meta tags, HTTPS, and parseable content for AI crawlers.

low

Fix HTML structure and meta tags

low|low

Unlock Full Improvement Plan

Top Opportunities10

Unlock Opportunities

Fix It With AI41

Unlock AI Fix Prompts

41 copy-paste prompts ready - sign in to access.

Score Breakdown

Criteria

Status

Potential

Score

llms.txt File

critical+10 pts0/10

RSS/Atom Feed

critical+10 pts0/10

Speakable Schema

critical+10 pts0/10

Visible Date Signal

critical+10 pts0/10

Image Context for AI

critical+9 pts1/10

Content Freshness Signals

critical+8 pts2/10

Content Licensing & AI Permissions

critical+8 pts2/10

Content Publishing Velocity

critical+8 pts2/10

Creator Transparency

critical+8 pts2/10

Methodology Transparency

critical+8 pts2/10

Unlock Full Audit Report

See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.

Your competitors are already optimizing for AI

Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.

Fix My Score

Site Pages

URLCitationSiteIn-linksCategoryIssuesWords

nanonets.com/solutions/finance-and-accountingFinance & Accounting Automation with AI

F39

services

3,944

nanonets.com/solutions/finance-and-accountingF39

Finance & Accounting Automation with AI

nanonets.com/solutions/human-resourceHuman Resource Automation with AI

D42

content

3,559

nanonets.com/solutions/human-resourceD42

Human Resource Automation with AI

Changes since v1Last audited 29 days ago

→

View full comparison →

Criterion

Delta

Schema.org Structured Data

7/10

8/10

Clean, Crawlable HTML

8/10

9/10

Entity Authority & NAP Consistency

9/10

8/10

-1

Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility

6/10

8/10

Table & List Extractability

10/10

8/10

-2

Content Licensing & AI Permissions

0/10

2/10

Schema Coverage & Depth

5/10

9/10

Content Cannibalization

7/10

5/10

-2

Topic Coherence

6/10

7/10

Content Depth

10/10

9/10

-1

First-Hand Experience Signals

4/10

3/10

-1

Evidence Packaging

4/10

6/10

Entity Disambiguation

4/10

6/10

Extraction Friction Score

2/10

6/10

Page Speed: Server Response

8/10

7/10

-1

Page Speed: Load Blockers

4/10

8/10

Page Speed: Page Size

8/10

7/10

-1

Sentence Atomicity

8/10

10/10

Increase Publishing FrequencyImprove Helpful Purpose AlignmentReduce Extraction FrictionAdd Entity Disambiguation

Improve Your Score

Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement

Criteria0/10

llms.txt -The File That Separates 63 from 34

Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.

Beginner·8 min readRead guide →

Criteria0/10

RSS Feed Presence & Quality

Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.

Beginner·3 min readRead guide →

supplementary0/10

Speakable Schema Markup

Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.

Beginner·3 min readRead guide →

Criteria0/10

Visible Date Signal: The Freshness Cue AI Checks Before Citing You

AI engines are biased toward recency. An article with no visible date is an article AI can't trust to be current. Visible Date Signal measures whether your pages show clear publication and update dates that both humans and machines can read.

Beginner·5 min readRead guide →

Want us to improve your score?

We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.

Let's Talk

Verdict

How to Improve

Unlock Full Improvement Plan

Top Opportunities10

Unlock Opportunities

Fix It With AI41

Unlock AI Fix Prompts

Score Breakdown

Unlock Full Audit Report

Your competitors are already optimizing for AI

Site Pages

Improve Your Score

Related Questions

Want us to improve your score?