AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

motives.ai — v2 vs v3

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v2Last audited 135 days ago
47
→
52
+5
Criterion
v2
v3
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
7/10
+7
Q&A Content Format
4/10
9/10
+5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
6/10
+1
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
3/10
5/10
+2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
8/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
6/10
+6
Definition Patterns
5/10
7/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
2/10
5/10
+3
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
4/10
+2
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
2/10
+2
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
4/10
+4
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Content Depth
5/10
4/10
-1
Creator Transparency
5/10
6/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
3/10
2/10
-1
Evidence Packaging
0/10
1/10
+1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
4/10
-2
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
3/10
-2
Improve Citation-Ready WritingImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Original Data & Case StudiesRestructure Content as Q&A