AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

mono.la — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 139 days ago
41
→
46
+5
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
9/10
+9
Q&A Content Format
5/10
7/10
+2
Clean, Crawlable HTML
4/10
6/10
+2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
6/10
+3
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
3/10
5/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
6/10
+6
Direct Answer Paragraphs
5/10
8/10
+3
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
10/10
+10
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
2/10
+2
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
8/10
+8
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
7/10
+7
Topic Coherence
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Depth
5/10
4/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
3/10
4/10
+1
Entity Disambiguation
3/10
1/10
-2
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
7/10
+3
Entity Density
8/10
6/10
-2
Add Answer Capsule PatternsAdd Content Freshness SignalsImprove Question-Answer AlignmentStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)