AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

methoddatascience.com — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 147 days ago
53
→
49
-4
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
9/10
5/10
-4
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
3/10
-3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
3/10
6/10
+3
Internal Linking Structure
5/10
3/10
-2
Table & List Extractability
8/10
3/10
-5
Definition Patterns
3/10
5/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
9/10
4/10
-5
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
4/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
7/10
8/10
+1
Query-Answer Alignment
10/10
0/10
-10
Helpful Purpose Alignment
9/10
7/10
-2
First-Hand Experience Signals
9/10
5/10
-4
Answer-First Placement
10/10
7/10
-3
Evidence Packaging
3/10
5/10
+2
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
3/10
-2
Page Speed: Server Response
7/10
8/10
+1
Page Speed: Page Size
8/10
7/10
-1
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
8/10
+4
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
10/10
+2
Improve Question-Answer AlignmentAdd Structured Tables & ListsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Content Freshness SignalsPackage Evidence for AIAdd Answer Capsule PatternsAdd Schema.org Structured DataIncrease Fact & Data Density