iterable.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
49
→54
+5Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
10/10
0/10
-10
Q&A Content Format
5/10
8/10
+3
Clean, Crawlable HTML
10/10
8/10
-2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
8/10
6/10
-2
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
10/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6/10
5/10
-1
Content Freshness Signals
7/10
10/10
+3
RSS/Atom Feed
3/10
10/10
+7
Table & List Extractability
6/10
4/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
9/10
4/10
-5
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
9/10
-1
Query-Answer Alignment
4/10
0/10
-4
Content Cannibalization
6/10
10/10
+4
Visible Date Signal
9/10
10/10
+1
Topic Coherence
3/10
5/10
+2
Content Depth
7/10
9/10
+2
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
7/10
+1
First-Hand Experience Signals
4/10
3/10
-1
Creator Transparency
4/10
3/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
5/10
-1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
1/10
-5
Extraction Friction Score
2/10
4/10
+2
Image Context for AI
1/10
0/10
-1
Internationalization Signals
8/10
3/10
-5
Page Speed: Server Response
5/10
6/10
+1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
2/10
5/10
+3
Page Speed: Page Size
3/10
2/10
-1
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
2/10
-2
Owned Data Density
6/10
4/10
-2
Sentence Atomicity
10/10
6/10
-4
Add Entity DisambiguationAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsIncrease Content DepthRestructure Content as Q&AReduce Extraction Friction