hospiceofwc.org — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 76 days ago
52
→49
-3Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
8/10
+8
Q&A Content Format
3/10
2/10
-1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
7/10
10/10
+3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
9/10
7/10
-2
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
3/10
10/10
+7
Internal Linking Structure
6/10
8/10
+2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
9/10
6/10
-3
Content Freshness Signals
5/10
8/10
+3
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
9/10
+9
RSS/Atom Feed
3/10
0/10
-3
Table & List Extractability
10/10
3/10
-7
Direct Answer Paragraphs
8/10
4/10
-4
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
4/10
+4
Fact & Data Density
6/10
8/10
+2
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
7/10
+7
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
8/10
+8
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
0/10
-7
Content Cannibalization
9/10
10/10
+1
Visible Date Signal
0/10
10/10
+10
Topic Coherence
10/10
9/10
-1
Content Depth
9/10
3/10
-6
Creator Transparency
3/10
4/10
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
8/10
4/10
-4
Answer-First Placement
6/10
8/10
+2
Entity Disambiguation
4/10
1/10
-3
Duplicate Content Blocks
5/10
7/10
+2
Page Speed: Server Response
7/10
6/10
-1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
7/10
4/10
-3
Page Speed: Page Size
10/10
4/10
-6
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
4/10
-2
Increase Content DepthImprove Question-Answer AlignmentAdd Structured Tables & ListsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsAdd Entity DisambiguationImprove Citation-Ready WritingFix Duplicate Content BlocksIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd Schema.org Structured DataPackage Evidence for AIAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsIncrease Publishing Frequency