Moderate AI visibility with 36 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: owned data density.
Verdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 54/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Q&A Content Format, and Content Freshness Signals. Priority gaps: Owned Data Density, Image Context for AI, and Content Licensing & AI Permissions. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI33
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
AI engines increasingly prioritize content from people who have direct experience with their topic. Generic "top 10 best" listicles written from secondhand research score poorly. Pages with specific actions taken, limitations discovered, and numeric results earned score well. First-Hand Experience Signals measure whether your content shows evidence of real-world involvement.
Your content is brilliant. AI can't read it. Sentences averaging 35 words, jargon-packed leads, and hidden content behind toggles create friction that makes AI skip you for a simpler source. Extraction Friction measures how hard AI has to work to pull answers from your pages.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.