Weak AI visibility with 19 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Verdict
Critical AEO gaps at 35/100 - gynius.se is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Content Cannibalization, and Duplicate Content Blocks. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, Internal Linking Structure, and Table & List Extractability. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI44
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI crawlers follow internal links to discover and contextualize content. A page with zero inbound links is a page AI will never find. Hub pages linking to 20+ related articles signal topical authority that both engines reward.
Your comparison table looks great in the browser. But it's built with divs and CSS Grid, so ChatGPT sees a blob of text. Here's what that costs you.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.