forgedsports.co — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 54 days ago
35
→50
+15Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
1/10
8/10
+7
Clean, Crawlable HTML
3/10
10/10
+7
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
1/10
3/10
+2
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2/10
5/10
+3
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4/10
7/10
+3
Internal Linking Structure
0/10
8/10
+8
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
9/10
+5
Content Freshness Signals
0/10
2/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
2/10
7/10
+5
Table & List Extractability
0/10
5/10
+5
Definition Patterns
0/10
5/10
+5
Direct Answer Paragraphs
2/10
10/10
+8
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
2/10
0/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
0/10
2/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
10/10
6/10
-4
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
7/10
+7
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
3/10
+1
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
10/10
+5
Content Cannibalization
5/10
10/10
+5
Visible Date Signal
0/10
5/10
+5
Topic Coherence
10/10
7/10
-3
Content Depth
0/10
5/10
+5
Helpful Purpose Alignment
7/10
6/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
4/10
3/10
-1
Methodology Transparency
4/10
2/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
0/10
8/10
+8
Answer-First Placement
6/10
8/10
+2
Evidence Packaging
0/10
1/10
+1
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
1/10
+1
Extraction Friction Score
7/10
3/10
-4
Image Context for AI
0/10
3/10
+3
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
8/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
4/10
9/10
+5
Answer Capsule Pattern
5/10
4/10
-1
Entity Density
3/10
6/10
+3
Sentence Atomicity
3/10
6/10
+3
Focus Content on Core TopicsAdd Owned Data SignalsIncrease Fact & Data DensityAdd Content Freshness SignalsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready WritingImprove Internal Linking Architecture