electrokare.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 133 days ago
49
→33
-16Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
5/10
1/10
-4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
9/10
7/10
-2
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
1/10
-4
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
4/10
-1
Comprehensive FAQ Section
3/10
0/10
-3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5/10
1/10
-4
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
0/10
-8
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6/10
4/10
-2
Sitemap Completeness
6/10
0/10
-6
Table & List Extractability
5/10
0/10
-5
Definition Patterns
7/10
5/10
-2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
0/10
-4
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
0/10
-2
Fact & Data Density
8/10
6/10
-2
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
0/10
-2
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
5/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Content Depth
5/10
3/10
-2
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
7/10
+1
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
4/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
4/10
+2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
8/10
0/10
-8
Evidence Packaging
3/10
0/10
-3
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
3/10
-1
Image Context for AI
1/10
5/10
+4
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
5/10
-5
Page Speed: Server Response
8/10
7/10
-1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
8/10
10/10
+2
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
5/10
+1
Entity Density
6/10
3/10
-3
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
3/10
-5
Restructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready WritingStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Owned Data SignalsAdd Content Freshness SignalsPackage Evidence for AIBuild Comprehensive FAQ Section