dmodel.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 92 days ago
29
→54
+25Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
1/10
8/10
+7
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
2/10
5/10
+3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
0/10
4/10
+4
Internal Linking Structure
1/10
0/10
-1
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
0/10
4/10
+4
Content Freshness Signals
0/10
2/10
+2
Table & List Extractability
0/10
5/10
+5
Definition Patterns
5/10
7/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
8/10
+8
Author & Expert Schema
0/10
2/10
+2
Fact & Data Density
0/10
7/10
+7
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
10/10
+5
Content Cannibalization
5/10
10/10
+5
Topic Coherence
5/10
8/10
+3
Content Depth
3/10
9/10
+6
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
7/10
+1
First-Hand Experience Signals
5/10
8/10
+3
Creator Transparency
5/10
6/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
5/10
3/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
0/10
8/10
+8
Answer-First Placement
5/10
6/10
+1
Evidence Packaging
0/10
8/10
+8
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
4/10
+4
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
2/10
-3
Image Context for AI
5/10
2/10
-3
Answer Capsule Pattern
5/10
2/10
-3
Entity Density
3/10
2/10
-1
Owned Data Density
0/10
10/10
+10
Sentence Atomicity
3/10
6/10
+3
Improve Internal Linking ArchitectureBuild Comprehensive FAQ SectionAdd Answer Capsule PatternsAdd Content Freshness SignalsAdd Schema.org Structured DataStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)Increase Content DepthFocus Content on Core TopicsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsRestructure Content as Q&AImprove Citation-Ready WritingPackage Evidence for AI