AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

disputebuddy.co — v1 vs v2

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v1Last audited 139 days ago
56
→
53
-3
Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Q&A Content Format
10/10
6/10
-4
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5/10
7/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
6/10
7/10
+1
Table & List Extractability
3/10
5/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
10/10
4/10
-6
Author & Expert Schema
9/10
4/10
-5
Schema Coverage & Depth
9/10
8/10
-1
Topic Coherence
8/10
5/10
-3
Content Depth
7/10
8/10
+1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
7/10
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
7/10
+2
Evidence Packaging
2/10
6/10
+4
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
6/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
10/10
9/10
-1
Entity Density
8/10
6/10
-2
Owned Data Density
6/10
4/10
-2
Focus Content on Core TopicsAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsIncrease Entity DensityAdd Owned Data SignalsRestructure Content as Q&APackage Evidence for AIIncrease Content DepthImprove Citation-Ready WritingAdd Entity DisambiguationImprove Internal Linking Architecture