AEO Content AIAEO Content AI
AEO WebsiteFast, citation-ready websites for the AI era
Research-grade ContentOriginal evidence built for AI answers
Content FactoryHow topic clusters scale with quality controls
AboutCompany, mission, and team
AuditsRankingsPricing
Knowledge BaseGuides and best practices
ResearchMethodology and findings
FAQFrequently asked questions
LoginFree AuditLet's Talk
Free AuditLet's Talk

Platform

AEO WebsiteResearch-grade ContentContent FactoryAboutAuditsRankingsPricing

Resources

Knowledge BaseResearchFAQ

datasub.com — v2 vs v3

← Back to latest audit

Side-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.

Changes since v2Last audited 109 days ago
49
→
63
+14
Criterion
v2
v3
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
7/10
+7
Q&A Content Format
0/10
3/10
+3
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5/10
9/10
+4
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
10/10
+5
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
8/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
5/10
8/10
+3
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
6/10
+2
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
0/10
-2
Sitemap Completeness
9/10
8/10
-1
Direct Answer Paragraphs
5/10
10/10
+5
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
4/10
+4
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
9/10
+5
Fact & Data Density
10/10
8/10
-2
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
10/10
+10
Query-Answer Alignment
7/10
4/10
-3
Topic Coherence
8/10
10/10
+2
Content Depth
1/10
0/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
2/10
1/10
-1
Creator Transparency
4/10
3/10
-1
Entity Disambiguation
6/10
4/10
-2
Image Context for AI
0/10
1/10
+1
Internationalization Signals
0/10
3/10
+3
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
6/10
+2
Sentence Atomicity
6/10
8/10
+2
Improve Question-Answer AlignmentAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsImprove Citation-Ready WritingAdd Original Data & Case StudiesAdd Direct Answer ParagraphsAdd Answer Capsule Patterns