bonafide.ai — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 64 days ago
42
→51
+9Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
9/10
+9
Q&A Content Format
0/10
1/10
+1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
4/10
10/10
+6
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
6/10
+3
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4/10
6/10
+2
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
6/10
-2
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6/10
9/10
+3
Sitemap Completeness
9/10
8/10
-1
RSS/Atom Feed
8/10
0/10
-8
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
2/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
9/10
+7
Fact & Data Density
10/10
8/10
-2
Content Publishing Velocity
10/10
7/10
-3
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
10/10
+10
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
4/10
+4
Content Cannibalization
7/10
6/10
-1
Visible Date Signal
0/10
9/10
+9
Topic Coherence
8/10
4/10
-4
Content Depth
1/10
0/10
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
5/10
6/10
+1
Methodology Transparency
2/10
3/10
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
5/10
-1
Answer-First Placement
6/10
8/10
+2
Evidence Packaging
4/10
5/10
+1
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
3/10
+3
Extraction Friction Score
6/10
5/10
-1
Duplicate Content Blocks
5/10
10/10
+5
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
3/10
10/10
+7
Internationalization Signals
3/10
8/10
+5
Page Speed: Server Response
6/10
7/10
+1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
4/10
10/10
+6
Page Speed: Page Size
8/10
10/10
+2
Answer Capsule Pattern
2/10
6/10
+4
Focus Content on Core TopicsAdd First-Hand Experience SignalsFix Duplicate Content BlocksStrengthen Entity Authority (NAP)