bioeureka.com — v2 vs v3
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v2Last audited 54 days ago
48
→47
-1Criterion
v2
v3
Delta
Schema.org Structured Data
9/10
0/10
-9
Q&A Content Format
2/10
6/10
+4
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
8/10
6/10
-2
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4/10
1/10
-3
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
3/10
-5
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
7/10
6/10
-1
Content Freshness Signals
7/10
2/10
-5
Sitemap Completeness
10/10
9/10
-1
RSS/Atom Feed
10/10
6/10
-4
Table & List Extractability
3/10
8/10
+5
Definition Patterns
5/10
3/10
-2
Author & Expert Schema
7/10
0/10
-7
Fact & Data Density
7/10
8/10
+1
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
7/10
+5
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
0/10
-10
Content Cannibalization
5/10
10/10
+5
Visible Date Signal
3/10
0/10
-3
Topic Coherence
7/10
10/10
+3
Content Depth
5/10
4/10
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
5/10
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4/10
5/10
+1
Answer-First Placement
7/10
8/10
+1
Evidence Packaging
0/10
3/10
+3
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
4/10
+4
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
4/10
+1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
4/10
6/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
7/10
9/10
+2
Answer Capsule Pattern
4/10
2/10
-2
Entity Density
10/10
6/10
-4
Sentence Atomicity
8/10
10/10
+2
Add Answer Capsule PatternsImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureAdd Content Freshness SignalsIncrease Entity DensityAdd Structured Tables & ListsPackage Evidence for AIRestructure Content as Q&AFocus Content on Core Topics