adaptyvbio.com — v1 vs v2
← Back to latest auditSide-by-side scorecard and opportunities diff between two published versions.
Changes since v1Last audited 78 days ago
53
→54
+1Criterion
v1
v2
Delta
llms.txt File
0/10
10/10
+10
Q&A Content Format
2/10
5/10
+3
Clean, Crawlable HTML
6/10
9/10
+3
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
4/10
5/10
+1
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
2/10
-3
Internal Linking Structure
2/10
6/10
+4
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
5/10
9/10
+4
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
4/10
+2
Sitemap Completeness
6/10
0/10
-6
Table & List Extractability
10/10
5/10
-5
Definition Patterns
5/10
7/10
+2
Direct Answer Paragraphs
10/10
7/10
-3
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
2/10
-2
Fact & Data Density
10/10
8/10
-2
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
0/10
-10
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
0/10
-2
Content Cannibalization
10/10
5/10
-5
Visible Date Signal
0/10
2/10
+2
Content Depth
10/10
6/10
-4
Helpful Purpose Alignment
7/10
6/10
-1
First-Hand Experience Signals
4/10
5/10
+1
Creator Transparency
2/10
4/10
+2
Methodology Transparency
4/10
2/10
-2
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
4/10
-2
Answer-First Placement
4/10
8/10
+4
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
4/10
-1
Duplicate Content Blocks
7/10
10/10
+3
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
3/10
10/10
+7
Page Speed: Server Response
5/10
6/10
+1
Page Speed: Load Blockers
7/10
9/10
+2
Page Speed: Page Size
3/10
8/10
+5
Entity Density
8/10
10/10
+2
Increase Content DepthAdd Structured Tables & ListsImprove Citation-Ready WritingImprove Internal Linking ArchitectureEliminate Cross-Page Duplicate ContentAdd Content Freshness Signals